![]() ![]() It almost seems to me that, while the S/N did not necessarily coincide with a manufacturing date, that Nikon was at least paying some attention to this "coincidence." Else, why start the F2's S/N at 71?Īnother F2 S/N tidbit that I'm sure some of you already know. I also have an F2 with 74 as its first two digits. I have an F2 with a S/N that has 71 as its first two digits. ![]() It was first released in 1971 and its serial numbering began with 71. ![]() And then Nikon continued this with the F2. I think the rumor first got started with the F since, by later in its production run, the first two digits began to approximate the year of manufacture. I have a somewhat early F, with a S/N of 648xxxx. As most of you probably already know, the original F first saw the light of day in 1959, but its serial numbering started with 64. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |